Be Found.
 
Be Found.
Design and optimise your website.
contact us
 
Design and optimise your website.

Quiddity! - the SEO Blog

Subscribe to RSS Feed
Back to blog >

SEO UK: Google is What Counts

Monday, 30 June 2008


Ah, the blogging desire slips, then comes back again, and I return; a stronger, more svelte incarnation of my former self. Ladies, form an orderly queue please.

Actually, I lied, I've just been busy of late, and horror of horrors, allowed this blog to slip. Now I was a once a week person as it was, but when once a week slides into once a month then alarm bells start to ring and you know you're in trouble, regardless of what else is going on.

So I have taken the time out to return here and continue to venture tentatively into the realms of all that is social media, SEO, and blogging.

As I was innocently mooching through my feed reader this fine day, I came across this post: How bad is Yahoo and Live Search Traffic in the UK? from David Eaves at SEOCo. Edit: This post has been removed

His post showed the search engine referral stats over the past 30 days for his site and also Patrick Altoft's Blogstorm.

These stats only reinforce the argument that in the UK, optimising for anything other than Google is a waste of time.

Google rules the market for search engine traffic globally and on these shores they've pretty much hammered the final nail into the ramshackle coffins of what were once fine, upstanding pillars of the search engine fraternity. To be fair, when was the last time somebody asked you to make them number 1 in MSN search? So we optimise for Google, and any other referrals are seen as a bonus, though the chances are they'll have come from an international source.

But what puzzles me is the fact that the search results for Yahoo and MSN (is it worth mentioning Ask?) are so damned erratic. I used to hear that if you optimised with Google in mind then the other search engines would follow, but this clearly isn't the case. A single link can see a tremendous difference in rankings on these other search engines, and rankings have a peculiar habit of bouncing up and down, sometimes dropping at a tremendous rate in the space of two weeks.

Google rankings, however, tend to build steadily.

Another thing I've noticed on an overall basis is that as the Google rankings increase, Yahoo's seem to slip away. Maybe it's just me. Who knows?

All I can say is, for the UK at least, concentrate on Google as your source of search engine traffic. The other search engines took their eye off the ball for too long and should be wheeled out to pasture so they can enjoy their twilight years in comfort, reminiscing amongst themselves on past glories and how it used to be.

 

What do you think? Let me know with a tasty comment or two.

Add to SphinnBookmarkSubscribe

Comments

I do not see how small businesses can ignore Yahoo! and MSN. We cannot determine which search-engine those looking for servies we offer use.

We are repeatedly told that the key to getting higher on the Google Organic ( Natural listings) is content and hyperlinks on other good quality web-sites to one's own site.

Why does this formula not work with Yahoo! ?

Yours,

Bryan Dunne
Marketing Manager
London Registrars Ltd
www.london-registrars.co.uk
Bryan Dunne on Monday, 30 June 2008 14:22
Hi Bryan, thanks for dropping in.

I'm not saying ignore the other engines completely, but to concentrate your efforts on Google and what are the known factors that can influence your website rankings. When a portal owns around 90% of the search engine market, as it does in this country, you have to put them at the forefront of your campaign if you're gunning for maximum exposure.
Nick James on Monday, 30 June 2008 15:55
Hi Nick,

I'm currently doing some SEO research for our site as we've slipped a little down the natural results this year.

Part of it is likely to be to do with the number one spot being taken by a business with the exact url of what we offer, but we're also wondering if the extent of our links are now doing us harm. The majority of our links (from client sites, industry event sites etc) go to our core product page with the same link text every time. Could Google be starting to mark us down for link spam?
Rachael on Tuesday, 01 July 2008 13:19
Hi Rachael,

Identical, keyword-rich anchor text spread over a vast amount of websites may very well be the problem. Google may mark it out as an attempt to manipulate their rankings, and either discount a great deal or all of the links. Obviously rankings will suffer for the particular keyword phrase you're targetting because of this, which could be the case here. Other reasons your rankings could be slipping is if your website has been buying text links. Paid text links are often easy to detect because of the manner on which they're placed on the page, and once again the identical, keyword-rich anchor text.

It's always best to diversify anchor text, and not to to try and get a massive amount of links for the same keyword phrase in one fell swoop. Google like naturally formed links, with no intent of search engine manipulation. If your site does get flagged, then all this identical anchor text could well come back to haunt you.
Nick James on Tuesday, 01 July 2008 16:44
Yah-who...?
James Duthie on Wednesday, 02 July 2008 00:09
Ha ha. Well said, James. Case closed ;)
Nick James on Wednesday, 02 July 2008 09:12
Hi Nick, I love this post! You've touched on a couple of topics that are near and dear to my heart: Optimizing for Yahoo and the differences, and how the search engines market share is so different in different countries. Often the "truisms" that apply to the U.S. don't make sense in other markets because Google has a different market share.
JennOsborne on Thursday, 03 July 2008 04:19
Thanks Jenn. You're absolutely right. A good majority of the information that is out there regarding SEO comes out of the US, yet the rest of the world isn't simply a microcosm of the US market. Different factors come into play, and although techniques remain largely the same, the individual marketplaces don't.
Nick James on Thursday, 03 July 2008 15:37
Google is always better now and forever. It brings 80% of my daily traffic.. yahoo and others are far behind..
Jun Valasek on Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:21
Hi all,

George here. I'm new to SEO and have started with blogging. Good to nice seo tips from you guys.

cheers.
george on Sunday, 20 July 2008 22:25
What are the differences between optimising for the UK/USA? Is LinkedIn news groups relevant for the UK market? Where should the effort be put in?
Ruth Stark on Sunday, 15 February 2009 18:24

Add comment

Name
E-mail (will not be published)
Website URL
Please enter the following code in the box below:

SEO articles

SMO (Social Media Optimisation) Basics - Part 2

As I discussed in the first part of this article, social media or SMO (Social Media Optimisation) has become a successful bedfellow of SEO (Search Engine Optimisation) in the promotion and marketing of a website. SEO companies have set up departments to... 
read more >>

SMO (Social Media Optimisation) Basics - Part 1

There is an interesting offshoot of search engine optimisation and internet marketing that has become extremely popular in its relatively short lifetime. A term has been coined for this new development and that is SMO, or Social Media Optimisation... 
read more >>

SEO Copywriting - With the Word comes Power

SEO Copywriting Services
... Wars are started with a badly chosen word or two. Adversely, wars can also be halted through words. Words can convince us of one argument's merit against another's. Words can spark revolution and dramatic social change. Thankfully words are also their to entertain us. They can bring laughter or tears. Exhilarate and enthral. But ultimately words sell ... 
read more >>

increase website trafficsite map